
Is Society now too Complex for Us? - cont'd ( page 2 )
Book reviews and discussion by Andy James, B.Sc (Econ), FCA, MQT
(article published through Wholistic Healing Publications)
The first book by Homer-Dixon to attract widespread interest was The Ingenuity Gap: How Can we
Solve the Problems of the Future? He writes:
“Most of us suspect that the world we have created is too complex and fast-paced for us to
understand, let alone control. Most of us sometimes guess that even the ‘experts’ don’t
really know what’s going on, and that as individuals and as a species we’ve unleashed
forces that we cannot manage. The challenges facing our society range from international
financial crises and global climate change to pandemics of tuberculosis and AIDS; they
cross the spectrum of politics, economics, technology, and ecological
affairs…….Complexity, unpredictability, the pace of events in our world, and the severity of
global environmental stress, are soaring. If our societies are to manage their affairs and
improve their well-being they will need more ingenuity – that is, more ideas for solving their
technical and social problems” (Homer-Dixon, 2000, p 1)
“Looking back from the year 2100, we’ll see a period when our creations – technological,
social, ecological – outstripped our understanding and we lost control of our destiny. And
we will think: if only we’d had the ingenuity and will to prevent some of that. I am convinced
that there is still time to muster that ingenuity, but the hour is late.” (Homer-Dixon, 2000,
book jacket)
I corresponded with Homer-Dixon intermittently after Ingenuity Gap, but lost touch with his work
until I noticed his 2007 bestseller, The Upside of Down: Catastrophe, Creativity and the Renewal of
Civilization. Again I was struck with the thoroughness and scope of his academic research and the
resonance between his ideas and mine, especially as expressed in Ageless Wisdom Spirituality.
He uses two parallels throughout his latest book: The Roman Empire and volcanoes. He identifies
five “tectonic stresses” building beneath the surface of our societies:
1. Population stress, arising from the overall increase in global population and also the
differing population growth rates in rich and poor societies. More megacities are expected
to sprout in poor countries even as their populations en masse try to get into the rich
countries, legally or illegally.
2. Energy stress, especially from the dwindling, harder to tap, oil resources.
3. Environmental stress from damage to land, water, forests and fisheries.
4. Climate stress resulting from changes in the makeup of our atmosphere.
5. Economic stress resulting from instabilities in the global economic system and the vast and
widening gaps between rich and poor people.
He sees “Energy Stress” playing a pivotal role, since energy is the Master Resource on which all
empires/ civilizations are built. For the Roman Empire and its dominance of the greater
Mediterranean area, it was food/ agriculture, which fed its military armies and prolific builders. For
modern global civilization, it is OIL. The days of cheap oil are over and from now on, it will cost us
ever more effort/ energy for each barrel of oil produced and consumed. In formal economic terms,
we have entered the phase of “diminishing marginal returns”.
As we work ever harder just to maintain our lifestyles, there is less and less resilience in society to
absorb any “unexpected” natural disasters, pandemics or attacks, even by relatively small groups.
Indeed Homer-Dixon points out two “multipliers” which give the “tectonic stresses” greater force
and speed. “The first multiplier is the rising speed and global connectivity of our activities,
technologies and societies. The second is the escalating power of small groups to destroy things
and people”. He points out warning “foreshocks” like 9/11, the 2003 black out of America’s (and
Canada’s) east coast, SARS etc. and why they have been ignored by our embedded denial
systems.
Homer-Dixon also explains a puzzling dynamic which I have long pointed out in my writings and
talks, but which no economist, entrepreneur or politician has so far been able to justify: What is the
logic of society persevering with an economic system which stresses ever more consumption and
“growth” (irrespective of what products are consumed) in the face of dwindling vital resources,
degradation of the natural environment and the growing gap between the rich and poor? Why, for
example, does Canada (where I live) need to continually grow and compete with other countries,
when it is in the uniquely fortunate position of having abundant natural resources, geographical
advantageous borders (except in cases of extreme ill-will from the USA) and a highly educated and
inventive population? He writes:
“In essence then, the logic underpinning our economies work like this: if we are discontented with
what we have, we buy stuff; if we buy enough stuff, the economy grows; if the economy grows
enough, technologically displaced workers can find jobs; and if they find enough jobs there will be
enough economic demand to keep the economy humming and to prevent wrenching political
conflict. Modern capitalism’s stability – and increasingly the global economy’s stability – requires
the cultivation of material discontent, endlessly rising personal consumption, and the steady
economic growth this consumption generates”. (Homer-Dixon, 2007, p196-197)
“Why? There are many reasons. But a central and often overlooked one is that consumerism
helps anesthetize us against the dread produced by empty lives – lives that modern capitalism and
consumerism have themselves helped empty of meaning.” (Homer-Dixon, 2007, p197)
As most of us will have guessed, in spite of the “Free” Market Democracy rhetoric, we do not really
compete on a level playing field:
“Our economic elites don’t just encourage consumerism. Through their influence on the
media and on society’s political process, they create, reproduce and justify a pervasive and
interlocking system of rules and regulations.. that promotes growth and that, in the process,
buttresses their power and privilege.” (Homer-Dixon, 2007, p216)
“For the vast majority of us who sell our labor in the marketplace, our economic security
and relative powerlessness impel us to play by the rules. And in capitalist democracy,
playing by the rules means not starting fights over big issues like our society’s highly
skewed distribution of wealth and power”. (Homer-Dixon, 2007, p217)
He warns that if we try to overextend the growth phase of our civilization, ignoring warning signs, it
is like bottling up a volcano – the eventual explosion may lead to deep, devastating collapse, from
which recovery will be painstaking and slow. Among the alternative options open to us is a nogrowth/
steady-state economy.
Although Homer-Dixon’s analysis of our present collective challenges is insightful, detailed and
thoroughly researched, he offers no detailed suggestions in either of his books as to how the
required change in human behaviour can or will occur. In his last chapter, he rightly remarks, “In
Western liberal societies, public discussion of values is dreadfully impoverished…. Because we’re
reluctant or unable to talk about moral and existential values – and these values remain largely
unexplored – utilitarian values fill the void”. (Homer-Dixon, 2007, p300-301) He wonders about the
possibility of a new Axial Age, “a transformation, simultaneously around the world, of the deepest
principles guiding mankind’s diverse civilizations.” (Homer-Dixon, 2007, p300)
My book, Ageless Wisdom Spirituality, focuses on precisely this subject – not only like Homer-
Dixon, pointing out the specific warning signs/ foreshocks in our collective lives, but explaining why
collective change depends on individual change and what such change necessitates. It is beyond
the scope of this article to adequately summarize Ageless Wisdom Spirituality and its implications,
so I will just make a few points in conclusion:
1. Based on my personal and teaching experience, Simplicity can indeed overcome
Complexity as Krishnamurti has asserted. If we are completely aware in the present
moment, then we create Space/ Emptiness wherein the apparent opposites (Yin-Yang) are
reconciled, whether Empty/ Full, Active/ Passive etc. In this space, understanding, wisdom
and compassion can emerge. The Tao Te Ching states: “Non-existence is called the
antecedent of heaven and earth; Existence is the mother of all things. From eternal nonexistence,
therefore, we serenely observe the mysterious beginnings of the Universe. From
eternal existence, we clearly see the apparent distinctions. These two are the same in
source and become different when manifested”. (Chu Ta-Kao, 1972, p 11)
2. I see Simplicity Overcoming Complexity as an integrative and transformative spiritual
process, which includes the Individual beginning to overcome Separateness (and thereby
moving into Oneness), whether seen in terms of My religion Vs Your religion, Human Vs
God, Rich Vs Poor, Black Vs White, East Vs White etc. Differences are not denied but
understood in a different context, which may include different levels of reality or
consciousness.
3. Our collective crisis is occasioned not so much by inadequate resources, information and
technologies, but by the fact that we waste so much in competition, conflict, war and sheer
confused bungling. The necessary Collective Will to cooperate, trust and share will only
come about through an expanded and deeper understanding of “I” and “We”. This of
course will change our relationship with those we view as “The Other/ Them..
4. I do not think we need a new Axial Age so much as interpreting and actualizing the wisdom
of the first Axial Age (twenty-five hundred years ago) at a deeper level, far beyond the
religious polarization and fundamentalism which is now being paraded as spirituality. The
Vedanta and the Buddha in India, Laozi and Confucius in China, and the early Greek
philosophers all point to a possibility of human consciousness far higher than our present
average consciousness. Over the last 400 years we have invested in the external world,
while neglecting the internal and this has opened up a gap between the power of our
technologies and our ability to use them wisely.
5. In order to embark on such a widespread journey of personal transformation of
consciousness, we firstly (and urgently) need to talk about it in ways which are not yet
broadly manifesting. At the moment, the mainstream media seems mesmerized by
extremism, which makes more exciting news .. and in some cases, the “extremists” also
control certain media outlets. On most TV networks, shows discussing religion, in trying to
show “balance” and “fairness”, usually feature representatives of Judaism, Christianity and
Islam, with Islam put forward as representing the East. In fact, all three are essentially the
same Abrahamic religion, while the rest of the world’s spiritual treasure trove is ignored.
I would like to end on a personal, positive note. At the end of Ageless Wisdom Spirituality, I
passionately called for such a public discussion (as in # 5 above). Shortly before the book was
launched, I received a synchronous phone call from an old friend inviting me to join The Forge
Guild, an international organization of trans-traditional spiritual teachers and leaders. Around
about the same time, I built and opened a sustainable energy off-grid retreat centre and since then,
my life has been filled with spiritual teachers and groups from many different global traditions!
References
James, Andy; Ageless Wisdom Spirituality: Investing in Human Evolution. Xlibris, U.S.A., 2003
Homer-Dixon, Thomas; The Ingenuity Gap: How Can we Solve the Problems of the Future? Alfred
A. Knopf, New York, Toronto, 2000
Homer-Dixon, Thomas; The Upside of Down: Catastrophe, Creativity and the Renewal of
Civilization Vintage Canada, Toronto, 2007.
Translation by Chu Ta-Kao, Tao Te Ching, Unwin Books, London, 1972)
<Back